Monday, September 27, 2010

What is Truth?


“For this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me,” said Jesus.” To which, Pontius Pilate asked, “What is truth?” (John 18:38). What is truth? The New Testament shows that Jesus came to testify to the truth that we are all beloved sons and daughters, to testify to the truth and reality of the social injustices going on in his time, and to testify to the truth of the freedom, healing, forgiveness, and mercy available to us if we choose to radically love our neighbors and God the Father as he did.

In his book, “Where is God?” John Sobrino says that if we hear and respond to the truth, it leads to a conversion. This is consistent with Jesus’ message of, “Those with ears to hear should hear (Mark 4:9)”. Jesus’ message and ministry were about conversion and transformation, not maintenance of the status quo. He was radical in the eyes of the people of his time. Sobrino notes that reality challenges us to see the truth (e.g. “with eyes to see”) of what’s going on in society and the world and react out of mercy.

Jesus’ call to conversion was a call for people to see the reality of what was going on in the world: the social injustices, economic injustices, cultural injustices, and political injustices. He told parables like the Good Samaritan that turned people’s expectations of cultural norms upside down, and he shared table fellowship with the outcast and downtrodden in his society. But why didn’t others see the world the way he saw it? Sobrino points out that the truth and how we see it is based on our cultural narrative and the group of people in power who are driving that cultural narrative in politics, society, and the media.

As Jesus experienced, blindness to truth often occurs because people are acting out of their head and not their heart. People in society both then and now are often trying to preserve their power, position, and possessions. In Roman times the poor, downtrodden, and widows had no status, and the Jews were captives in their own country. That was the cultural narrative the Romans and the Jewish leaders saw when they encountered Jesus. They saw him as dangerous because he was threatened to overthrow the current power structure.

Circling back to Jesus and Pilate’s original conversation in the praetorium, I would offer that that each of them was seeing different versions of the truth. Jesus’ vision of the truth was radical while Pilate’s was traditional (as defined by Peter Henriot). Pilate, as the authority holding power, defined (along with the Jewish leaders) what the “truth” was and were guilty of culpable blindness because they did not want to see the truth of “reality” that was right in front of them. Power was more important to them than truth.

In the words of Jack Nicholson from the movie, A Few Good Men, the Roman and Jewish leaders of the time, “couldn’t handle the truth,” that Jesus was talking about, and I think the same is true today. If the veil of injustice in our world was lifted tomorrow, our hearts would all break in sorrow for all of the poverty and suffering that exists.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

A Slice of Life on the Red Line


It’s 8:30 AM the Friday before Labor Day weekend. Young and old, black and white get on the train at Jarvis. A black man wearing a business suit gets on at Morse. At Loyola there’s a white women with a stroller, and a black woman on her cell phone. A young girl texts a friend. A man in torn jeans calls but there is no answer. He’s holding a note pad and a large dictionary.

I also was holding a note pad that day. I observed who got on and who got off the Red Line at each stop from Howard to 95th Street and back again. It took about 3 hours all told. I saw the neighborhoods change as the passengers changed - - in dress, skin color, and temperment. I saw people moving in the world together, yet silently sitting in their own silent worlds while en route to their own private destinations. The only break in the library-like silence of the train was the occasional giggle of little children who didn’t know any better.

At Bryn Mawr a black boy waves to another passenger and makes them laugh. while other riders talk on the phone, text their friends, and listen to their iPods. At Berwyn, the boys’ mother holds her phone up to her son’s ear to have him join her conversation with a friend. When the child departs with his mother at Lawerence, he waves goodbye.

The diversity of the passengers is apparent at Lawerence as white, black and Hispanic board the train. At Jackson, the same diversity is visible amidst the sounds of a street performer who sings hip hop as the doors are closing. At Grand and Roosevelt, two Asian men board the train, and an Indian man boards at Garfield Park.

On the north side, passengers are largely white, wearing jeans or shorts. A girl sits next to me reading her eBook while holding a cup of coffee in her other hand. Several white men on the train choose to stand near the doors even though there are seats available.

On the south side, black passengers follow social norms that are less formal. Many nod off and sleep, some eat their breakfast, talk audibly on their cell phones, or put their feet up on a nearby seat while singing along with their MP3 player.
The racial divide on the morning train is obvious at Jackson, Monroe, and Chicago. Black men and women exit and white men and women get on. Also, white men exit at 35th street for the Sox game, and at the Addison stop for the Cub game.

No one boards the train at Granville and Argyle on the north side or 63rd, 69th, and 87th on the south side. At 79th street I realize for the first time that I am the only white person on the train car. For a moment I feel fearful. Then I smell pickles and see a woman behind me grab an onion ring from her Burger King sack and I realize I’m just part of the fabric of a diverse tapestry of people who ride the Red Line on the way to somewhere each day.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

The Challenges of our Consumer Culture


Our consumer culture in America thrives each day because marketers and advertisers convince us that their product or service will fulfill a real or suggested need we have. Their pitch is that by buying this product or that, we will feel better, be happier, look younger, live longer, save time, save money, live better lives, or will simply differentiate ourselves from our neighbors. Do we buy stuff because we need it, because we want it, or because it makes us feel good? The answer is often one or more of the above.

John Kavanaugh, author of “Following Christ in a Consumer Society”, suggests that our consumer culture in America has become a method of self expression. Our buying behavior has become an expression of our thoughts, feelings, and even our identity. We see ourselves in the personae described in a specific brand. We buy the brand, and we become that brand or personae. We’re the Pepsi generation, who’s stuck on Band-Aid, is like Mike, and deserves a break today at McDonalds.

Meanwhile we do also have interior, spiritual lives that compete with the outside world to tell us who we really are. This voice doesn’t come from a radio or television ad, but from our Creator. In our consumer culture where our identities are often defined by what we wear, what we drive, and what we drink, our inner voice is often drowned out or simply ignored. We act on our feelings to buy goods and services each day, but we don’t feel safe expressing our interior feelings to friends, families, or to our community. Being reflective or contemplative doesn’t have a place in consumer culture unless it involves buying a bible, a self help book, or a yoga mat. There is no call or space in our culture to be quiet, vulnerable, and meek (as Jesus talks about in the Beatitudes). Instead we’re called to be busy, strong, and continuously gratified by external messages from movies, music, and smart phones.

The truth is, I believe, that marketers and advertisers have been more clever and successful at calling us to fulfill our interior desires with external stimuli than the Church has been at convincing us that the way to a fulfilling interior life is through prayer and reflection. In our culture very few people are proclaiming the benefits of a deep, peaceful prayer life and even fewer are listening. Why? I think our culture doesn’t know what to do with it. What are the outward fruits or benefits will I gain by spending/wasting time in prayer? Why would I want to spend an hour of quiet time reflecting on my mother or father wound and listening for the voice of a God I can’t see? What good is that going to do? It’s more productive to just grab a beer, watch a movie, and forget about it.

When we live in alignment with our consumer culture of keeping up with the Jones’, however, we are living a lie. We are not being the authentic selves God made us to be. Jesus says the Lord wants to take care of all of our day-to-day needs, “Do not worry about your life … look at the birds in the sky; they do not sow or reap, they gather nothing in barns, yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not more important than they? … So do not worry and say, “What are we to eat? Or What are we to wear? Your heavenly Father knows what you need … Do not worry about tomorrow; tomorrow will take care of itself.” (Matthew 6:25- 34)

To cope with the disconnect with our interior lives that comes from our consumer culture, Roger Betsworth says in his book, “Social Ethics”, we often construct Cover Stories to help us find a sense of affirmation and safety. Real Story: “How can I work at McDonald’s during the day and read Martha’s Stewart’s “Living” at night, and still feel good about myself? Cover Story: Well, this job is only temporary until I finish school, so it’s okay for me to fantasize about what my first house might look like.” Cover Stories protect us from the truth and pain of who we really are.

In summary, you could say that in our society, consumerism is the Cover Story that most Americans buy into on a daily basis. First, consumerism is a part of the cultural narrative of how we Americans look at the world, and, second, it is part of the story we try to maintain everyday about our identities. “I am this type of person in our society because I can afford these things. It’s not really who I am, but I work every day to maintain this story and standard of living because people would reject me if I didn’t. I would never let people know how wounded and fearful a person I really am. Without all these possessions I would feel naked and alone.”